• 0

    posted a message on Salt Time, fed up

    People always play decks, that work better than the others. That is why we see Skellige dominating the ladder. We used to see Nilfgard all over the place, and Consume Monsters before that... damn there was a time when people were salty about Control Radovid or sick thinning done by Scoia (Mercenary + BMC combo). 

    Frankly speaking I feel like it's a matter of days/weeks. CDPR will release yet another patch causing a meta shift... it's always like that. Meta decks are countered by decklist that becomes a new meta.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Ciri - lol

    I'm afraid we're going nowhere with this thread. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Axemen decks are hopeless vs NR machines

    Dear All,

    I believe that the thread was created to discuss a specific matchup (NR machines vs. SK axeman), and mechanics like dealing damage that ignores armor.

    I would like to remind you that everyone is allowed to share thoughts, tactics, and opinions. Hateful language or harassment will not be tolerated.

    // Thread moved to General Discussion 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Succubus bug?

    Unfortunately it's a well known bug. There are quite a few threads created about that. I would suggest to post and discuss if further here: http://www.gwentdb.com/forums/gwent-feedback/beta/962-succubus-xbox-bug

    Thread closed.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Problem with Succubus on console

    It's a well known bug which has been reported to CDPR already.

    Thread closed. 

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on "Succubus bug"

    As stated above - it's a known bug. I'm therefore closing this thread.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Assire var anahid in NG vs NG

    I think it's a well known bug.... or rather "a feature that is obvious, but for some reason, has not been implemented yet".

    You can't tell which cards are in which GY. I think I saw quite a few threads asking for that particular feature as it makes certain cards useless in mirror matchups. At the time being we can only sit and wait for CDPR to announce next patch.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on How important is "tempo"?
    Quote from Hanseul >>

    and by tempo, what I understand is playing big points in single turn to get ahead of your enemy fast. (Correct me if I'm wrong)

    You are correct. "Tempo" describes the pace at which you bring value to the table. 
    The thing is, that you need to find a healthy balance between low-tempo and high-tempo plays. It means, that you need to know and understand meta decks in order to be successful on the ladder. 
    I used to play a deck, which may be similar to the one you described (frost + carryover). I noticed however, that for most of a time I could not keep up with round 1 tempo. My carryover was nullified, as my opponents did not commit to round 2. Thanks to that I was left with no fuel for round 3. 
    Crones are love-have kind of thing. Some people can't think of a monster deck without them... some would tell, that 3 silver slots is a little too much to sacrifice. They provide you with 20 points tempo swing, and they thins your deck - which in my personal is an added value that can not be overlooked. 
    Posted in: General Deck Building
  • 0

    posted a message on Problem with languages

    Thread closed and moved to Gwent Feedback forums.

    Posted in: Beta
  • 0

    posted a message on Is Savage Bear overpowered?

    Dear All,

    I understand the discussion is hot, as there is always someone, who gets hit by a patch. It doesn't change the fact that I would prefer if everyone gets back on a subject of discussing the card. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Alzur's Double–Cross functionality

    Alzur's Double–Cross will always pull the strongest unit from your deck - ties are resolved randomly.

    Have you, by any chance, played Dennis Cranmer first? This could strengthen Cleaver... That's the only reasonable explanation I could give you... other than "it's a bug deal with it".

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Changing my Display Name

    Closing the thread. Please PM me in case further assistance is needed.

    EDIT: For those of you wondering how to change your display name -> you have to get in touch with moderator or an admin. 

    Posted in: Site Feedback & Support
  • 0

    posted a message on Request for legacy mode?

    There is more than that. Some of the cards have the same mechanics, but were changed due to tags/types being added/removed. So called "medic chains" were huge, back in the closed beta days. Then, the "Permadeath" tag was introduced, which is now replaced by "Doomed" category. Even though both means pretty much the same - you still can find significant differences (doomed card will not go to your GY when removed).

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Request for legacy mode?

    You will not be able to control or even track which version of a card people use. Some of cards we know today, were completely reworked, some mechanics are no longer available... don't feel like that's going to work. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Closed, talked to support. Just a bug, not my computer

    Glad to hear that. :)

    Closing the thread.

    Posted in: Beta
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.